
Island
Wide Approach to Recycling in


Draft
Final Report
7/20/2009
P.Nicolaides and
Associates Ltd
4.1 European
Union legislation
5.1.1 Waste
Framework Directive (2006/12/EC)
5.1.2 Packaging
and Packaging Waste Directive 94/62/EC: glass, metals, plastics and paper
5.1.4 Regulation
(EC) No 1013/2006 on shipments of waste
5.2.1 Waste
Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) 2002/96/EC
5.2.2 Packaging
and Packaging Waste Directive 94/62/EC.
5.2.3 Challenges
of the existing framework
5.3.1 “Law on
Environmental Protection 21/1997”
5.3.2 Solid
Waste Management Regulation (SWMR)
5.3.3 Challenges
of the existing Framework
6 Current
status of Recycling in the Two Communities
6.2.1 Municipal
Solid Waste (MSW) Production
6.2.2 Waste
Management Practices
6.3.1 Municipal
Solid Waste Production
6.3.2 Waste
Management Practices
7 Opportunities
and obstacles for Bi-Communal
Cooperation
7.1 Proposed
cooperation scenarios
8 Best
Available Techniques and International Practices
8.1.1 Method
1: Reuse of storage containers
8.1.2 Method
2: Full glass recycles
9.1 Bi-communal
Sorting or Recycling Facility
9.1.1 Description
of the Facility
9.1.3 General
Issues and Obstacles
9.2 Upgrade and Use of Existing Facilities
9.2.1 Existing
Recycling Facilities in GCC and TCC
9.2.3 Identification
of preferred waste streams for cooperation
9.2.4 Benefits
of Proposed Scenario
9.2.5 Obstacles
to the Proposed Scenario
9.4 Measures
Promoting the Cooperation
UNDP – ACT in
As
part of its six-year Programme (2005-2011) aiming to help Cypriots to deepen
the bonds of cooperation and trust, UNDP has initiated the study “Island-wide
approach to recycling in
More
specifically, this project is intended to research the existing fate of waste
streams in both communities, with a particular focus on household appliances,
electronics equipment, plastics, metal, glass and paper. Following this
analysis, a comparison of the existing situation with EU requirements will be
undertaken, leading to concrete recommendations for bi-communal opportunities for recycling.
The
Present report comprises of:
·
A presentation of related programmes
·
A presentation of the island profile
·
Presentation of the EU institutional and
legal background regarding waste management as well as the regulatory framework
within each community.
·
A presentation of the current recycling
status of the two communities
·
A feasibility study on proposed
cooperation actions
The latest data for the TCC (May 2006) and show a population of 264,000. The TC population of Nicosia area is 85,000[1]. It must be noted however that the census recorded everyone who was present within the TCC area on the day of census, including tourists and everybody who was in the country for temporary reasons.
The main languages on the island are Greek, Turkish and English. Main religions found on the island are: Greek Orthodox (78%), Muslim (18%), Maronite, Armenian Apostolic, and other (4%).
The
GCC economy has an estimated GDP per Capita of €27,000 (for 2007) and a growth
rate of about 3.7%. Main economic activities are the services (mainly tourism),
industry (mainly construction) and agriculture contributing 80%, 18% and 2% of
the national GDP respectively (2008 figures). The used currency after the
accession to the EU in 2004 is the Euro.
The
TCC economy is dominated by the services sector (69% of GDP in 2007), which
includes the public sector, trade, tourism and education. Industry (light
manufacturing) contributes 22% of GDP and agriculture 9%. Assistance from
In the context of the fifth enlargement
of the EU, of 1st May 2004,
Furthermore,
for the support of the TCC economy, a number of economic measures have been
established by the EU. An EU aid regulation towards the TCC amounting to 259
million euro, was adopted in February 2006.
The
GCC is divided into 6 districts, 27 municipalities and 363 communities (Table 1)
Table 1: GCC Administration
Divisions
|
Districts |
Municipalities
(>5,000 population) |
Communities (<5,000 population) |
|
|
8 |
95 |
|
Limassol |
5 |
103 |
|
Larnaca |
4 |
48 |
|
Paphos |
4 |
101 |
|
|
3* |
6* |
|
Kyrenia
|
3** |
10** |
|
|
27 |
363 |
*after 1974
**before 1974
Waste
Management is fragmented in GCC, with many departments having responsibilities
over different waste streams. The main authorities involved with waste
management are:
§ Ministry
of Interior (MOI): responsible for the overall management of domestic waste and
the drafting of legislation and policy on waste.
§ Ministry
of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment (MANRE): The Environment
Service (ES) of MANRE is responsible for a variety of waste related matters
such as recycling, packaging waste and hazardous waste. Its responsibilities
arise from the Waste Framework Law 215(Ι)/2002 and the Law
on Packaging and Packaging Waste No.32(I)/2002. According to Regulation 668-2004, the ES is also responsible for the
implementation of the WEEE directive in
§ Local
authorities: Responsible for the collection, disposal and treatment of domestic
waste and the operation of waste treatment facilities.
The TCC is divided into five “districts”:
The general local administrative
structure in TCC operates at two levels: through “Municipal Councils” and “village”
Commissions. These are independent bodies responsible for the management of
their local affairs and there is no hierarchical relationship between them. “Municipal
Councils” constitute the form of local structures in the district towns and in a
number of large “villages”. “village” commissions constitute the local
structures in all remaining “villages”[2].
“Mayors”, mukhtars, members of the “Municipal
Councils” and “village” Commissions are elected by universal suffrage. Thus, the
central authorities’ involvement is limited to extending technical and
administrative support and supervision.
Waste
management and all other environmental issues are the responsibility of
the “Department of Environmental Protection”
under the “Ministry of Environment”. The “Department of Environmental
Protection” was established in 1990 and its operation is dictated mainly by the
“Environmental Framework Law 21/97”.
The
responsibility for collection, treatment and disposal of municipal waste is
placed on the local authorities.
However, the “Ministry of Environment” is responsible for monitoring and
control of waste management operations. According to the legislation, waste
disposal installations are obliged to obtain permits, but the requirements are
comparatively soft and limited to an environmental impact assessment before the
start of operations. In addition, the requirements seem to be quite informal
and poorly implemented as all existing landfills are operating without permits.
The
EU waste management regime is set out in two parent directives: the Waste
Framework Directive (2006/12/EC) and the complementary Hazardous Waste
Directive (91/689/EEC). These directives are supported by two groups of
“daughter Directives”. One group sets out legal requirements for waste disposal
facilities, e.g. landfills. The other group deals with specific waste
streams such as waste oils, packaging waste and batteries. Relevant to all of
these directives is the Waste Shipment Regulation ((EC) No 1013/2006).
The
main daughter directives dealing with recycling are:
·
Packaging
and packaging waste directive (94/62/EC)
·
Waste
oils directive (75/439/EEC)
·
Directive
on batteries and accumulators
(91/157/EEC)
·
PCB/PCT
directive (96/59/EC)
·
Directive
on end-of-life vehicles (2000/53/EC)
·
WEEE
directive (2002/96/EC)
For
the purposes of this study the relevant directives that will be discussed in
more detail are:
·
Packaging
and packaging waste directive (94/62/EC)
·
WEEE
directive (2002/96/EC)
Due
to the fact that
Due
to the political situation in
The Directive 2006/12/EC is the
basically the amendment of Directive 75/442/EEC and its amendments: directives
91/156/EEC, 91/692/EEC, 96/350/EC, and 96/59/EC
This directive is the framework for
management of all waste and forms the basis for all following directives.
The framework directive prescribes
central principles:
§ The waste
management hierarchy: Prevention, re-use, recycling and recuperation of energy
and materials get priority.
§ Principle of
Best Available Technology (BAT): disposal facilities must be equipped with the
best available technology. The BAT is selected on technological, environmental
and economical criteria.
§ Principle of
proximity: Waste must be treated as close as possible to the place of
production or collection.
§ Principle of
Self-sufficiency: Every member state, every community is responsible of its own
waste.
§ Polluter Pays
Principle (PPP): Waste disposal facilities must not be paid by tax payer’s
money, but by the polluter.
The
directive also puts specific obligations on the member states to ensure corporate governance. Every state must make a
waste management plan which integrates
local, regional and national needs. The Member state is responsible for control on the disposal facilities. A
system of licenses has to be introduced.
Member states must install a monitoring and reporting system in accordance
with the European guidelines.
The
European Union (EU) Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive aims to harmonise
national measures for managing packaging and packaging waste in the EU. The aim
is to prevent or reduce impacts on the environment of all
The
directive lays down measures aimed primarily at preventing the production of
packaging waste and, as an additional fundamental principle, at reusing
packaging, and recycling and other forms of recovery of packaging waste, hence
reducing the need for disposal.
In
addition to the general objectives, the directive has three sets of specific
targets:
§ Quantitative
targets for recycling and recovery
§ Essential
requirements to be fulfilled in order to place packaging on the European market
§ Targets
for the concentration of heavy metals in packaging.
In December 2004, Directive 94/62/EC
was amended by the Directive 2004/12/EC which establishes criteria
clarifying the definition of the term 'packaging'. Clear examples are given in
Annex I, such as tea bags, which are non-packaging, and the film overwrap
around a CD case or labels hung directly on or attached to a product, which are
packaging. This Annex replaced Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC. This project is only concerned
with the four main packaging waste streams: glass, paper, metal and plastic.
Table
2 that follows shows the targets and
deadlines of the parent and amended directive.
Table 2: Recycling and recovery targets of the
packaging directive
|
|
Act
Directive (94/62/EC) |
Amended Directive |
|
Deadline
for all |
30.06.2001 |
31.12.2008 |
|
for P,
GR, IRE |
30.06.2005 |
31.12.2011 |
|
for
new members |
2005 - 2009 |
31.12.2012 – 2015 |
|
Recovery |
Min.: 50 % |
Min.: 60 % |
|
Max.: 65 % |
Max.: - |
|
|
Recycling |
Min.: 25 % |
Min.: 55 % |
|
Max.: 45 % |
Max.: 80 % |
|
|
Recycling of
Specific Materials |
||
|
Glass |
Min.: 15 % |
Min.: 60 % |
|
Paper |
Min.: 15 % |
Min.: 60 % |
|
Metal |
Min.: 15 % |
Min.: 50 % |
|
Plastic |
Min.: 15 % |
Min.: 22,5 % |
At the end of 2006, the Commission presented a report on the implementation of the Packaging Directive and on the options for increasing the prevention and reuse of packaging.
Directive 2005/20/EC set a later deadline for the 10 new Member States (the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia) to meet the targets of the revised Packaging Directive. The extensions are until 31 December 2012.
Table 3: The packaging and packaging
waste directive and its amendments
|
Act |
Date of entry into force |
Final date for implementation
in the Member States |
Official Journal |
|
Directive
94/62/EC |
31.12.1994 |
30.6.1996 |
OJ L 365, 31.12.1994 |
|
Amending Act(s) |
Date of entry into force |
Implementation in the Member
States |
Official Journal |
|
Directive
2004/12/EC |
18.2.2004 |
18.8.2005 |
OJ L 47, 18.2.2004 |
|
Directive
2005/20/EC |
5.4.2005 |
9.9.2006 |
OJ L 70, 16.3.2005 |
Source:
Europa Website
The WEEE
Directive is aimed at reducing the amount of waste electrical and electronic
equipment that ends up in landfills. It is broad in scope, covering most electrical and electronic
equipment used by consumers or intended for professional use that may end up in
the municipal waste stream, including products sold in the EU from abroad and
products sold electronically.
Ten
categories of products are covered:
1.
Large household appliances (refrigerators, washing
machines, stoves, etc.)
2.
Small household appliances (vacuum cleaners,
toasters, hair dryers, etc.)
3.
Information and telecommunications equipment
(computers and peripherals, cell phones, calculators, etc.)
4.
Consumer equipment (radios, TVs, stereos, etc.)
5.
Lighting (fluorescent lamps, sodium lamps, etc.)
6.
Electrical and electronic tools (drills, saws,
sewing machines, etc.)
7.
Toys, leisure, and sports equipment (electric
trains, video games, etc.)
8.
Medical devices (ventilators, cardiology and
radiology equipment, etc.)
9.
Monitoring instruments (smoke detectors,
thermostats, control panels, etc.)
10.
Automatic dispensers (appliances that deliver
products such as hot drinks).
Extended
Producer Responsibility (EPR) and Design
To encourage designs that facilitate repair, reuse, disassembly, and
recycling, the WEEE Directive establishes the principle of EPR for dealing with
this waste stream. Under the EPR producers, defined as the brand name on the product or the importer of
the product, are financially responsible for taking back their own products at
end of life and managing them in accordance with the directive. Producers may
form a collective system to fulfil their obligations. According to the Directive,
producers may not use design features that prevent products from being reused
unless such features provide overriding safety or environmental benefits.
Furthermore,
retailers are obligated to provide free take-back on an “old for new” basis.
Separate
Collection
A primary
goal of the directive is “to minimize the disposal of WEEE as unsorted
municipal waste and to achieve a high level of separate collection of WEEE.” To
this end, member states must ensure
that there are systems in place, financed by producers, to separately collect
waste electrical and electronic equipment from end users. This equipment must
be separately collected from private households at an average rate of at least
4 kg (8.8 lbs) per person per year. Convenient collection points must be
set up where municipalities can deposit waste equipment collected from
households or consumers can return their waste equipment free of charge.
Management
of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
Management systems may be organized by producers on an individual or
collective basis. The
directive sets separate targets for reuse/recycling and recovery (which
includes waste-to-energy recovery), based on amounts collected by weight.
Producers must give priority to reuse, and targets must be achieved by
December 31, 2006. Member
states must ensure that records are kept on the amounts of materials entering
and leaving treatment, recycling, and recovery facilities. The best available
treatment, recycling, and recovery techniques must be used. Member states must
also ensure that treatment facilities obtain all relevant permits from the
appropriate authorities.
Table 4: Product Category Recovery (%)
Reuse/Recycling (%)

December 31, 2006,Targets for Recovery and
Reuse/Recycling, by weight
Any exports of waste electrical and electronic
equipment for treatment must comply with EU and OECD (Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development) regulations on the
export of waste. Exported
equipment will not count toward recovery and reuse/recycling targets unless the
exporter can prove that the waste treatment methods used meet the requirements
of the directive. The directive also specifies many substances and components
that must be removed from all separately collected waste electrical and
electronic equipment. These include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury,
printed circuit boards in cell phones, plastics that contain brominated flame
retardants, and certain liquid-crystal displays (LCDs).
Financing
Producers are responsible for the costs of picking
up waste electrical and electronic equipment from collection facilities and for
refurbishing waste products for reuse or for recycling and recovery.
For “historical” products” (i.e., those put on the market before August
13, 2005), the costs of waste management are to be shared by all producers in
existence at the time those costs are incurred. These producers may impose a
separate “visible fee” (one that is explicitly designated, perhaps on the price
tag) to cover these costs for eight years (ten years for large household
appliances). End users other than households may be made partly or totally
responsible for financing the management of historical products. For new
products (i.e., those put on the market after August 13, 2005), producers have
“individual responsibility.” That is, they must pay the cost of managing their
own products. They can do this through programs set up by individual companies
or through participation in collective schemes. No visible fees are permitted
to fund the management of waste from new electrical and electronic products.
Labelling and Product Information
According to the Directive, every
product must bear a label that:
1.
verifies that it was put on the market after August
13, 2005
2.
verifies that it will be separately collected
3.
bears the name of the producer.
Producers must provide information to consumers on the collection
systems available and on the environmental and health impacts of hazardous
substances contained in waste electrical and electronic products. Producers must
also provide information to facilitate the environmentally sound reuse,
recycling, and treatment of waste electrical and electronic products. Such
information includes the identity of components and materials and the location
of dangerous substances inside a product.
Reporting
Member states must establish a register of producers and collect annual
information on the amounts of electrical and electronic equipment that are put
on the market, collected, reused, recycled, and recovered. They must transmit this
information to the EU Commission every two years.
Enforcement
Member states must establish inspection and monitoring systems and
impose effective penalties for lack of compliance.
Amendments
In December 2008 the European Commission proposed to revise the directives on electrical and electronic equipment in order to tackle the fast increasing waste stream of such products. The aim was to increase the amount of e-waste that is appropriately treated and reduce the number that go to final disposal as well as reducing the administrative burden.
The
Commission proposes to set mandatory collection targets equal to 65% of the
average weight of electrical and electronic equipment placed on the market over
the two previous years in each
This
Regulation replaces Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 with effect from 12 July 2007.
Its aim is to reinforce, simplify and specify the existing procedures for
controlling waste shipments. It will thus reduce the risk of waste shipments
not being controlled. It also seeks to incorporate into Community legislation
the amendments to the lists of waste annexed to the Basel Convention as well as
the revision adopted by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) in 2001.
This
Regulation sets two waste shipment
control procedures:
§ the
procedure for prior written notification and consent: the procedure applicable
to all shipments of waste intended for disposal and hazardous and
semi-hazardous waste intended for recovery;
§
the procedure in which shipments are
accompanied by certain information, applicable to non-hazardous waste intended
for recovery.
The
Regulation also sets two lists of waste authorised for shipment, corresponding
to the two control procedures described above: waste subject to notification
and consent features in the "orange list" (Annex IV), while waste
referred to for information purposes only features in the "green list"
(Annex III). On the other hand, waste that is prohibited for shipment features
in separate lists (Annex V).
Waste
shipments must be the subject of a contract between the person responsible for
shipping the waste, or having it shipped, and the consignee of such waste. Where
the waste in question is subject to a notification requirement, the contract
must include financial guarantees.
Under
the notification procedure, the notification must be submitted by the notifier
only to the competent authority of dispatch which, in turn, will be responsible
for passing it on to the competent authorities of destination and transit. The
competent authorities must give their consent (with or without conditions) or
express their objections within 30 days. Any changes involving the main aspects
of the shipment (quantity, itinerary, etc.) must be the subject of a new
notification, save in cases where all the competent authorities grant the
notifier an exemption from this obligation.
Furthermore,
interim recovery and disposal facilities are bound by the same obligations as
final recovery and disposal facilities. The authorisation of a shipment
involving interim operations can only be sanctioned if the shipment of the
waste in question has also been authorised.
If
a shipment cannot be completed (including recovery or disposal), the notifier
must take the waste back, normally at his own expense. The above rule applies
to all types of waste, subject to certain exceptions: if there is another way
of recovering or disposing of this waste or if the waste has been irretrievably
mixed with other types of waste. In the case of an illicit shipment, the
notifier or the consignee must, to the extent that the illegality is
attributable to one or other of them, take back, recover or dispose of the
waste.
The
Regulation includes other general provisions, such as a ban on the mixing of
waste during shipment, the making available to the general public of
appropriate information, and the obligation on the part of the notifier, the
competent authority, the consignee and the facilities concerned to keep
documents and information.
Exports
to third countries of waste intended for disposal are prohibited, except to
EFTA (European Free Trade Association) countries which are party to the Basel
Convention. Exports of hazardous waste intended for recovery are prohibited,
except those directed to countries to which the OECD decision applies, and to
third countries which are party to the Basel Convention or countries which have
concluded a bilateral agreement with the Community.
Imports
from third countries of waste intended for disposal or recovery are subject to
the same rules as exports. Member States must make provision for the
organisation of checks throughout the entire waste shipment and waste
recovery/waste disposal process.
In 2004, the
The GLR are a
set of rules that facilitate the trade of goods and the movement of persons
between the two areas whilst ensuring that appropriate standards of protection
are maintained. Since this project is only concerned with the trade of goods,
the regulations on the movement of persons will not be presented here.
Crossing
of Goods
Crossing of goods between the two areas
is regulated by Articles 4, 5 and 6 of the GLR. According to these Articles, goods may be introduced into the GCC, on condition
that they are wholly obtained in the TCC, or have undergone their last,
substantial, economically justified processing or working in an undertaking
equipped for that purpose in the TCC. Since the Green Line is not considered an
‘external border’, the abovementioned goods will not be subject to custom
declarations.
In order to
ensure effective controls, the quantities crossing the line shall be registered
and shall cross the line only at the official crossing points. The goods shall
be subject to the requirements and undergo the checks as required by EC
legislation.
Goods shall
be accompanied by a document issued by the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce
duly authorised for that purpose by the Commission in agreement with the Greek
Cypriot Authorities, or by another body so authorised in agreement with the
latter. The Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce or other duly authorised body
will maintain records of all such documents issued to enable the Commission to
monitor the type and volume of goods crossing the line as well as their
compliance with the provisions of this Article.
After the
goods have crossed the line ,the competent authorities shall check the
authenticity of the related documents. The GCC shall treat the goods as not
being ‘Imported’ and all goods meeting the requirements will be considered as
community goods.
Amendments
Following a
proposal made by the Commission on 10 April 2008, on 16 June 2008 the Council
adopted a Regulation amending the Green Line Regulation to further facilitate
trade on the
The amending Regulation
provides for a general lifting of duties on agricultural products originating
in the TCC when being traded across the Line. Furthermore, the total maximum
value of goods contained in the personal luggage of persons crossing the Line
is increased from € 135 to € 260 so as to encourage the economic development of
the Turkish Cypriot community. Goods up to this amount can now be introduced
free of customs, excise duties and taxes across the buffer zone.
This rule
does not apply to cigarettes and alcohol. Finally, the amendments regulate in a
transparent way the temporary introduction of goods (for up to six months) from
the TCC to the GCC.
The
The Waste Framework Law in GCC is the Solid and Hazardous Waste Law-215(I)/2002 and the relevant regulations, which achieve harmonization with the EU legislation on:
§ Directive 75/442/EC on waste and its amendments
§ Directive 91/689/EC on hazardous waste and its amendments
§ Regulation 259/93/EC on the supervision and control of shipments of waste
The Waste Electrical and Electronic
Equipment (WEEE) 2002/96/EC Directive was
transposed into national legislation on 30 July 2004 by the Regulation 68-2004. The key provisions of these
regulations are:
• Financing WEEE: Producers have to organize and finance separate
collection, sorting as well as transportation and treatment of WEEE from
households. Municipalities are not obliged to collect.
• National registry: Producers have to register with the
Statistical Service and the Environment
Service.
• System requirements: A joint system was approved for the
management of the waste under Green Dot
The Packaging and Packaging Waste
Directive 94/62/EC is transposed into the Cypriot legislation by the Law on
Packaging and Packaging Waste No.32 (I)/2002) and its following Acts:
·
KDP
746/2003
·
KDP
747/2003
·
N.133/2003
·
N.
159/2005
The purpose of the law is to prevent the
generation of packaging waste, to reduce the heavy metals contents in packaging
and to enhance reduction of packaging waste disposal by re-use, recovery and
recycling.
GCC has
achieved an adequate implementation of the requirements of the acquis communautaire as far as waste
management is concerned. However,
there are still issues to be addressed and areas of improvement:
·
Waste recovery
and recycling targets have still not met even though significant progress is
achieved
·
Necessary
infrastructure is still not completed i.e. licensed landfills
·
Licensing
of waste management operators is still underway
·
Fragmentation
of responsibilities between authorities
·
Monitoring,
inspection and enforcement powers are often weak and resources for monitoring
limited
·
Little
involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), citizen based
organizations(CBOs) or the public in decision making
Environmental protection, including waste management, in the TCC area falls within the authorities of the ‘Department of Environmental Protection’ under the ‘Ministry of Economy and Tourism’. The ‘Department of Environmental Protection’ was established in 1990 and its operation is dictated mainly by the “Law on Environmental Protection 21/97”. Another important legal act is the “Solid Waste Management Regulation (SWMR)” issued by the ‘Ministry of Environment’. Finally, there is the “Law on Municipalities” passed in 1995 and defines the functions and responsibilities of “municipalities” and mukhtars in providing waste management services.
Current rules set only very general requirements
for waste management[3].
The responsibility for collection, treatment and disposal of municipal waste is
placed on the “municipalities”. The “Ministry of Environment” is responsible
for monitoring and control of waste management operations.
The “Law on
Environmental Protection” is a framework that:
·
defines and lists the receiving bodies
·
defines the responsibilities of the
authorities like “ministry of environment”, and “environmental protection
department” and “municipalities”.
·
states what pollution means,
·
defines a what a polluter is
·
lists hazardous wastes
·
and defines wet lands
Section 6 and specifically Articles 23 and 24 deal
specifically with Solid Waste:
Article
23
· defines
what solid waste is,
· prohibits
the disposal of solid waste,
· states
that the “Ministry of environment” is the central authority for managing waste
minimisation and recycling
· refers
to the Solid Waste Control Regulation for further details
Article
24
·
States that waste collection is
implemented by local authorities e.g. “municipalities” or private organisations
hired by local authorities.
·
States that solid waste is “buried” in
specially designated disposal sites. However, there is no clear statement which
defines the responsible body from the services within the disposal site.
·
States how producers store solid waste
and recyclable waste
·
Defines the means for collection and
disposal of septic waste
·
Refers to the Solid Waste Control
Regulation for further details on waste disposal sites.
|
Section |
Description |
|
1 |
Section 1 states the objective,
scope and definitions related with solid waste management |
|
2 |
Article 5 states that solid
waste producers have to procure best available technique (BAT) to achieve
waste minimization. Article 7 and 8 state that the
“Environmental Protection Department” (“EPD”) and local authorities are
responsible for promoting and advertising waste recycling and minimization.
However the means for achieving these objectives are missing. Article 9 states that local
authorities are responsible for the separate collection of hazardous waste. The
“EPD” is the supervising authority for separate collection of hazardous
wastes and can apply economic and legal incentives to achieve hazardous waste
separation. |
|
3 |
Section 3 is related with minimization
and recycling of packaging waste. It states that all organizations using
packaging waste must apply for a permit for production. It clearly states
that “Waste recyclers must apply to the “EPD” for a permit”. |
|
4 |
Section 4 deals with the
collection of solid waste. It states that the local authorities are
responsible for the collection of waste. It also defines the methods of
storage for producers of kinds all solid wastes. |
|
5 |
Section 5 deals with the
disposal of waste to the dump sites. |
|
6 |
Section 6 defines what compost
and composting are. It states the technical requirements for composting in
the composting facilities. It lists the chemical and physical limit values
for materials to be composted and final product (compost). |
|
7,8,9 |
Deal with incineration, waste
disposal and collection service permits and agricultural use of wastewater
treatment plant sludge respectively. |
|
10 |
Section 10 states that all
activities listed under this regulation are inspected and supervised by the “EPD”.
It also mentions about formation of a “Waste Recycling Commission”. Briefly,
its duty is achieve cooperation of authorities and implement necessary
measures to achieve recycling of packaging waste. |
The
administration and management of the waste sector falls short of the
requirements of the acquis communautaire on
several counts including:
·
Waste regulations
that are not aligned with that of the acquis
in most areas
·
Inappropriate
structures and insufficient resources
·
Weak
regulations in terms of the definition of responsibilities and the allocation
of them.
·
Monitoring,
inspection and enforcement powers are also very weak
·
A lack
of approved strategic plans for the sectors
·
Little
involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), citizen based organizations(CBOs)
or the public in decision making
·
The
authorities are lacking the capacity to enforce even the existing legislations.
·
There
are no incentives for people to recycle or for companies to invest in waste
management
Furthermore, the requirements for specific recovery
and disposal operations or special waste streams are not established. Even
though the “Environmental Protection Department” is responsible for monitoring
and control of waste management operations, monitoring is not performed and the
rules are only partially enforced.
Another
problem is the lack of decision-making power of “municipal” authorities since
almost everything is determined by the central authorities. The local
authorities are not allowed to prepare master plans or general development
programs thus they have no planning responsibilities. These responsibilities lie
with the “planning department” . This lack of responsibilities is often welcomed
by the “municipal” authorities since they have very limited income and face
significant financial difficulties, thus being unable to fulfil additional
obligations.
The
adverse financial situation of many “municipalities”, in conjunction with the
limited (up to now) contact with European Institutions resulted in a ‘low
standard mentality’ of the civil authorities that allows irregularities and
poor implementation of the laws.
Due to
the aforementioned problems, and many more, investment levels in the sector
over many years have been at a level well below that needed for sustainability
and consequently the infrastructure cannot meet the standards needed to achieve
compliance with the environmental acquis.
Following the accession of Cyprus to the
EU, the EU Council of Foreign Ministers, considering that the Turkish Cypriot
community (TCC) had expressed its clear desire for a future within the European
Union, recommended on 26 April 2004 that the funds earmarked for the TCC in the
event of a settlement should be used to facilitate the re-unification of Cyprus
by encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community, with
particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island and on improving
contact between the two communities and with the EU.
Responding to an invitation from the
Council, the Commission proposed a comprehensive package of aid and trade
measures and, as a consequence, on 27 February 2006 the Council agreed
Regulation (EC) 389/2006, establishing an instrument of financial support for
encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community.
The Turkish Cypriot community has on its
side set up a number of structures to help the implementation and the
absorption of the aid Program and the process of progressive harmonization with
the acquis communautaire. In
particular, the Turkish Cypriot community established the EU Co-ordination
Centre and in turn a number of Change Management Committees, charged with
leading the process of approximation in their respective sectors.
The Environmental Change Management
Committee (ECMC) was established in May 2005. With technical assistance
received through the European Commission’s TAIEX instrument, it has to date
drafted sectoral approximation strategies for a number of environment
sub-sectors, including waste management, that will allow for further
development of TCC legislation and closing the gap with the EU acquis.
In
this Chapter a presentation of the current status regarding recycling, of the
relevant waste streams, in the two communities is carried out. The relevant
waste streams include: household appliances, electronics equipment, plastics,
metal, glass and paper. The analysis includes the presentation of the
following:
§ Types
of waste
§ Amounts
of relevant waste produced
§ Main
producers of the relevant waste
§ Main
recycling service providers
§ Policy
and Financing context for recycling
§ Stakeholder analysis: Identification
of most relevant stakeholders
(service providers, main waste producers, relevant decision makers etc)
At
the end of this chapter a ‘Gap analysis’ is performed to identify opportunities
for bi-communal cooperation and obstacles that might be met.
Based
on EU legislation, the following waste categories exist:
Table
6: Waste categories
|
Waste Category |
Waste Sub-Category |
|
Municipal
Solid Waste (MSW): |
Household
waste |
|
|
Packaging
waste |
|
Industrial
Waste: |
Hazardous
Waste |
|
|
Non
Hazardous Waste |
|
Other
Waste : |
End
of Life vehicles (ELVs) |
|
|
Waste
Tires |
|
|
Demolition
waste |
|
|
Waste
Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) |
|
|
Waste
Oil |
|
|
PCBs |
|
|
Agricultural
waste |
|
|
Hospital
Waste |
In
GCC the categorization applied in the EU is adopted. Similar categorization
exists in the TCC but there is no specific category for packaging and packaging
waste.
This
study focuses on the recycling of household appliances, electronics equipment,
plastics, metal, glass and paper. These waste streams are mostly related to the
categories of: Municipal Solid Waste (Household & Packaging Waste) and
WEEE. In Table 7 you can see the
relevant waste types. Furthermore, Table
8 presents the project relevant waste streams’ main sources.
|
Waste Category |
Waste sub-Category |
Waste Type |
|||
|
Plastic |
Metal |
Glass |
Paper |
||
|
Municipal Solid Waste |
Household Waste |
tables, chairs, cutlery, pipes,
kitchenware, toys, tools etc |
Tables, chairs, tools
cutlery, kitchenware, toys, tools etc |
Kitchenware, windows |
newspapers,
magazines, office paper, advertising leaflets |
|
|
Packaging Waste |
Plastic bottles,
flasks and PET, PE and HDPE jars, plastic casings, boxes and buckets, films
and other membranes |
Barrels, straps,
cans, boxes |
Bottles, jars |
Cardboard boxes,
paper wrapping, paper bags, tetrapack |
|
Other waste |
WEEE (household appliances,
electronics equipment) |
Rubber hoses, electric wiring,
body parts |
Body parts, electric wiring,
mechanical parts etc. |
Monitor glass |
- |
Table 7: Project
relevant waste streams
Table 8: Project
relevant waste streams’ main sources
|
Waste
Stream |
Material |
Main
Source |
|
Plastic |
Bottles |
Bars,
restaurants |
|
Paper |
Newspaper,
magazines, cardboard, office paper |
Supermarkets,
shops, schools, printing factories |
|
Glass |
Jars,
bottles |
Bars,
restaurants |
|
Metal |
Aluminium
and steel cans, iron, copper |
Bars,
restaurants |
|
Household
appliances |
fridges,
cooling equipment, washing machines |
Individual
households |
|
Electronic
equipment |
computers,
telecommunication devices |
Households,
businesses, offices etc. |
MSW
include all the household, packaging, office waste and commercial waste such as
white paper, cartons, glass, wood metal, plastic, organic waste, clothing,
detergents, some WEEE, tree cutting etc.
The majority of the relevant waste streams for this study i.e. metal, plastic,
paper, glass belong to this category of waste.
The waste production data for this waste
category are based on the ‘Strategic Plan for the Management of Solid and
Hazardous Waste’ that was approved in 2004, the Cyprus Statistical
Service, the 2007 ‘Report on the state
of the environment’ and data from Green Dot Cyprus Ltd.
The
overall production of MSW in 1993 in
The
composition of MSW, for the relevant waste streams, according to the ‘2007
Report on the state of the environment’ is presented in Figure 1. Based on the
Nicosia MSW production and the waste composition figures, the production of the
relevant waste streams is estimated and presented in Table 9.
Figure 1:
Composition of MSW (2005)
